The Innocence of Children in “Woman at Point Zero” and “The Glass Castle”

For far too long have young girls experienced oppression before they could even fathom the concept of equality. Whether it be United States or the Middle East, these girls enter a culture of a dominating patriarchy, and are subject to it whether they like it or not. In the most extreme cases, young women are sexually abused by men and must carry that burden with them throughout the rest of their life. In El Saadawi’s “Woman at Point Zero” and Wall’s “The Glass Castle,” both authors narrate the journey as a young girl as they are confronted with such of a patriarchal society.
In El Saadawi’s “Woman at Point Zero,” readers learn about the responsibility and concepts that young Firdaus was exposed to as a young child. When discussing about Islam and the men’s prayer, Firdaus also mentions that her “breasts were not yet rounded” (21). The juxtaposition of these sexualised body parts shows that Firdaus, in all her innocence, associates such religion with sexual acts, seeing no issue or vulgar connotation. It is the patriarchy that sets these standards within Firdaus’ society that young children learn to stay quiet about such oppression of women. This ‘predatory’ nature of men is further expressed¬† in Firdaus’ description of the men in prayer, depicting them with “doubting, stealthy eyes, eyes ready to pounce, full of an aggressiveness that seemed strangely servile” (21) as if they were a hunter stalking its prey. The fact that Firdaus is able to understand the malicious intent of these men with indifferent commentary shows that, again, despite being confronted with these horrible concepts of sexual abuse, her child-like innocence allows her to accept them and conform towards the patriarchal society.
In Wall’s “The Glass Castle,” Jeanette expresses a more violent, yet also equally as shocking experience as a young girl that shows that even women are subject to the patriarchy in the developed western countries. In a brief confrontation with a young boy, Jeanette reveals that she was molested by him and that she had accidentally “touched it… even though [she] had never touched one before” (54). Looking at Jeanette’s choice of diction, it is quite obvious that she chooses to not mention any word representing a ‘penis’. From this, readers can assume that Jeanette is not mature enough to discuss such topics without being flustered, emphasising her innocence. Even when Billy, the young boy, declares that he raped her, she responds with “Big deal” (55), as she was still too young to understand the true weight of what rape or molestation was. Looking at the concept of Billy being proud of his molestation of Jeanette, readers can also see another side of the spectrum, where young boys and men grow up to see rape and molestation as acceptable within society.
In conclusion, El Saadawi and Walls express their stories as a statement and representation of young women grappling with the harrowing reality of a patriarchal society. Perhaps by expressing these issues and exposing the horrific issues that young girls must face, both authors declare that change must be present worldwide in order to reach true equality between genders.

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *