I chose the global issue of Art, Creativity and Imagination. I was most attracted to this global issue because of a key term included in its description – “beauty”. I find beauty to be a highly subjective and elusive concept to grasp, yet it is something that plays a major role in our human society. It intrigues me to beauty is so powerful yet has no substantial purpose. At the same time, I wanted to analyse the excerpt of Persepolis, and because it is a graphic novel, it seems fitting to examine how the artist portrayed characters aesthetically.
The artistic style reflects that the artist clearly doesn’t care about beauty in this excerpt of Persepolis. As evidenced by the lack of facial details, crude perspectives and cartoonish figures, the artist is not actively trying to make its objects seem “beautiful”. All characters appear similar. In panels 1-4, none of the girls are portrayed as unique. Each one of the characters have similarly shaped eyes, almost identical nose and mouth. The artists intent in this excerpt was likely just to symbolize the characters or expressions and not to make them aesthetically pleasing.
The artist also intentionally makes choices that eliminate the demonstration of beauty. To caricature beauty in people, the most potent ways to do it is to draw detailed hair, facial expressions and figure. In panels 1-4, none of the women show their hair or figure as a result of their donned chador. This intentional portrayal of the women is another one that excludes beauty.
Beauty is important, stereotypically especially with women. The artistic choice to reduce beauty in this excerpt of Persepolis is one that reflects the reality of women in Iran, where women were mandated to wear chadors that veil their beauty. This graphic novel is in English and aimed towards Western audiences. It’s obscuration of beauty is in stark contrast with the prominence of beauty in Western graphics.
While I was searching up some Chinese stereotypes, I found this “ultimate list of Asian stereotypes”.
I have to admit, I hate this so much. Lists such as these propagate stereotypes and add confirmations to previous ones. When some who aren’t informed read these lists they take them as true for all Asians, especially when some stereotypes about Asians aren’t true for all regions of asia. “48. Asians use “la~” in instant messenging” refers to Singaporians. “34. Asian parents talk for far too long when they meet other Asian parents” is essentially all parents. “27. Asians enjoy Kpop and Jpop even when they don’t understand the language”, hello?? What about Japanese and Koreans.
I guess it’s fine if people want to express their understanding of stereotypes from their perspective, but that’s what stereotypes are, opinionated. Everyone has a different understanding of stereotypes and to act as an authority on them (ultimate list) just seems wrong. At the same time, this list doesn’t even take the topic seriously.”What should the 50th stereotype be?” This isn’t so much an ultimate list but a list that couldn’t make it 50 entries long.
Oh well, such websites on the internet aren’t supposed to be seriously anyways. While there definitely are many scholarly articles researching stereotypes, it does coexist with some less compelling ones online.
What makes “To Live” so artfully devastating and soul-crushing is that the past is constantly dying. The narrative makes you fall in love with characters before ruthlessly bring “death” to them. This is in direct parallel to the reality of the cultural revolution, at its centre, the revolution aims to change and “kill” the past. The theme of the death of the past fits perfectly as it examines how the revolution affected the people and its scary, calamitous impacts.
The first major revolution moment of the film is when long’er gets executed. This scene is shocking. A character that was portrayed as high and mighty, someone who climbed to the top of the hierarchy is suddenly crushed under the new revolutionary force. The former wealthy of the society is gone, dead. Fugui feels this as well. He is flabbergasted when he sees long’er in the square. He pisses himself when five bullets are shot. The depiction of the scene shows the world-changing effect of the revolution, while long’er’s death demonstrates the potent communist strength.
If Long’er showed the death of societies upperclass, the burning of pupperts showed the death of culture. The audience has been seeing puppet shows since the beginning of the movie. Fugui’s singing moves along the plot while evoking the audience’s affection for this side of Chinese culture. However, they “must be burnt”. Even after they argued with the town head, “old” bits of culture like the puppets face no alternative besides being burnt. The definitiveness of this act of its destruction makes the audience mourn for the puppets. It’s something beautiful that the movie rips from the audience’ hands. This shows the revolution’s powerful grip on the people’s belongings and how pieces of the past are carefully wiped away.
The audience, as well as fugui begins doubting the revolution as seemingly everything faces “death”. Even the town leader, a character present throughout the entire film, is labeled as capitalist and most likely killed. The movie doesn’t dwell on this fact. It brings up the leader’s downfall and moves the plot swiftly along. This shows how no character can have a happy ending, even ones that aren’t important are brought down.
Every character in this film gets something positive in their lives: Long’er gets a house, Fugui gets a family, Chunsheng gets to drive, Fengxia gets married… However, everyone faces a bad ending. This happens because the revolution destroys the “past”. As the “past” dies, Long’er get’s executed, Fugui loses everybody, Chunsheng gets labeled as capitalist, fengxia dies when nobody could save her…
Propaganda almost always serves to rile up the society towards a common goal. And one of the most common goals societies have strived for is increased production. This understanding was the sole inspiration for this poster.
The first goal of this poster is to portray industrial labour as a positive, healthy activity. Brightness and contrast was turned up to the max which conveys a sense of warmth. Warm colours, especially yellow is highlighted as these colours symbolize youth, enthusiasm and other emotions that might stimulate appeal towards “production”. The second goal is to disprove the common notion that production isn’t “fun”. The thumbs up and smiling worker in the central focus of this poster enhances the positivity towards menial labour.